Open beta Give feedback
Open beta

Know what breaks before users do.

Paste a landing page URL or raw launch copy. Synthetic Users runs four sharp personas against it, then returns a leak report you can actually act on before real users bounce.

Run beta analysis Read docs
Beta checks:
landing pages
launch copy
onboarding
positioning
01

Submit a URL or text.

02

Get persona reactions.

03

Rewrite what leaks first.

01

Get first-impression reactions before buying traffic.

02

Pressure-test copy, flows, and assumptions with synthetic personas.

03

Ship a tighter launch page instead of praying to analytics later.

One system, multiple attack surfaces

Synthetic users don’t flatter you. Good.

The point is not fake validation. The point is surfacing weak claims, bad ordering, trust killers, and the obvious questions your launch page somehow forgot to answer.

01

Landing-page pressure test

Find what people misunderstand first, what they trust least, and what they mentally compare you against.

  • hero + subhead clarity
  • pricing/ordering friction
  • trust and proof gaps
02

Launch copy stress test

Run your X thread, announcement, or positioning line through synthetic people with different patience and technical depth.

  • strongest hook detected
  • "this already exists" responses
  • rewrite suggestions
03

Onboarding leak report

See where curiosity dies, where setup feels like work, and where the product creates doubt before payoff.

  • drop-off prediction
  • confusion hotspots
  • next test recommendations
Real beta artifact

The output should feel like a decision tool, not AI confetti.

You feed a page, PRD, launch post, or onboarding path. Synthetic Users returns a short decision memo: what landed, what confused people, what killed trust, and what to rewrite next.

Action memo beta output
What landed: concrete promise about reducing wasted launches.
What got missed: who exactly gets value first.
What killed trust: no visible output artifact above the fold.
Rewrite next: headline + proof section ordering.
Test after that: founder-focused hero versus PM-focused hero.
Synthetic set
skeptical engineerasks why this beats manual review
distracted founderwants faster proof before launch week
non-technical buyerneeds simpler wording and clearer payoff
cynical operatorsniffs out generic AI sludge instantly
Fast loop
1

submit page or launch copy

2

run synthetic personas

3

fix top leaks

4

rerun before public launch

Open beta feedback

What broke, what felt useless, and what should exist but doesn’t?

Don’t be polite. Tell us what confused you, what output missed the point, what you wanted to see, and what would make you come back and use this again. Wallet is optional.

Wallet not connected. That is optional. If you connect one, it gets attached as context.
Helpful feedback: exact failure, missing feature, weak output, unclear score, real use case.
Weak feedback: “cool site”, vague vibes, no example, no clear pain, no useful signal.
This goes into the open beta feedback queue so we can fix weak spots and decide what to ship next.
No feedback sent yet.
Feedback preview appears here before submit.